Richard Waters On Social Media
November 30th, 2006 | Published in Collaboration, Emergent Tactics
The other night I sat up late reading this Richard Waters article (FT). It’s not a bad article. Unfortunately it tries too hard to make a story out of something and in the process it unnecessarily polarizes the situation. Maybe I’ve lost my sense of humor… but Waters seems to be taking the issue seriously.I know, I know, I’ve read journalists before, they’re under a lot of pressure to create good stories. I should give Waters credit for looking into the issues of online collaboration and social media.
I should ignore Waters’ subtle cartoonization of things. Yet for reasons of style and context, it’s exactly his subtlety that concerns me. Waters seems to be crafting an innocent narrative, chock full of objective sounding references and name checking. He’s commanded a large piece of space on the front page of a section in the Financial Times. This isn’t a place for absurdist opinions. And so it’s almost as though the piece was designed to discredit some of the serious thought happening around these issues.
From the Waters article:
“On one side of this divide are the idealists who believe that individual expression and mass online collaboration, freed from the traditional constraints found in the offline world, can yield incalculable benefits. Traditional deference to expertise imposes a huge tax on society, argues Shirky - by concentrating perceived wisdom in a small number of people, it limits the flow of ideas. According to this view, the experts represent a ruling caste whose main interest is in protecting their own privileges. The internet offers a historic opportunity to undermine that authority.” Read the rest of this entry »


